Friday, August 17, 2012

Japan, China, Taiwan and the battle for the Senkaku islands




Earlier this week, I had read that 14 Chinese activists were arrested for placing a Chinese flag on the Senkaku islands. Not fully understanding what this debate was all about, I decided to do some research.

Known as Senkaku in Japanese, Diaoyu in Mandarin and Diaoyutai in Cantonese, there is an archipelago of eight islands being claimed by China, Japan and Taiwan. This archipelago is currently uninhabited and controlled by Japan and is located in the East China Sea (northeast of Taiwan and west of Okinawa). These islands are commonly thought to sit atop oil deposits, and are surrounded by rich fishing grounds. 

The Chinese claim that these islands were discovered during the Ming Dynasty; the Japanese claim that they discovered them in the late 1800s. Japan annexed the islands then in 1895 after winning the First Sino-Japanese War. China feels it was forced to sign the post-war treaty which handed the islands over to the Japanese.

In 1900, a brief attempt to make the island functionable by housing a bonito plant quickly failed; the islands remain vacant.

After World War II, the Senkaku islands were temporarily controlled by the United States. However, China does not recognize this Treaty of San Francisco.

In 1972, the Japanese regained control of the archipelago.

Earlier this year, Tokyo’s governor, Shintaro Ishihara raised three million with the help of private investors to purchase three of the islands. This has reignited the dispute.

Time magazine recently published a report which concluded that Japan needs to “resolve the ownership dispute over a tiny group of islands or risk an honest-to-goodness shooting war with China”. A former prime minister of Japan also said that “Where China sees an unrepentant Japan clinging to a legacy of colonial expansion, Japan sees an arrogant and erratic China once again bullying its smaller neighbors”.

The idea of war between China and Japan in this day and age seems unthinkable but the bigger question is, if it happens, will America get involved?


No comments:

Post a Comment